The equipment used for listening was my macbook pro feeding to an external non oversampling single bit DAC, fed to a heavily modified Creek OBH 11 headphone amp feeding a pair of HD's also modified , I alternatively also listened to the mac directly using the HD's and got the same listening results which were as follows. If any of you have listened to a top end vinyl player, and a similar priced CD player, there is often a greater sense of air and openness about the vinyl player, that's how I would liken it between the FLAC and DSD files.
The DSD being more airy and open, where as the FLAC sounds not closed in as such, but just not the same sense of spaciousness around either the vocals or the instruments. I listened to both Eva Cassidy and Goldfrapp, so two totally different types of vocals and music. I did notice one thing though, and that was the recording on the DSD file was slightly lower in volume, but I'm sure this could be altered in my import settings on the 'gain' settings.
My personal preference is the DSD file type, but at the end of the day that's just what it is, personal preference and how you like the sound of your music, are you a CD fan or die hard vinyl or even tape like myself I have tapes recordings I play on my CR7e that sound better than on the CD version , but as I say, it's all personal preference. I hope this clears the water rather than muddying it. Marine New Head-Fier.
Joined Feb 6, Posts 1 Likes Joined Nov 11, Posts 1, Likes I started experimenting with DSD today. After some fiddling I got it working.
I was surprised to find that when I switched back to my normal directstream output the file still played! Is that why it plays even over my native output method? Anyhow it sounded great but I don't have a flac version to compare to.
I downloaded the Stereo DSD version and was not thrilled by the fact the file was almost mg for a 4. I think such massive file sizes make DSD somewhat impractical unless you have some seriously massive harddrive to store everything. Joined Sep 18, Posts Likes That way you get one more level of synchronization within the computers. Main roles in each Agilist Framework.
DSD and PCM are just different modulations and it is not a matter for coded musical signal in the digital domain when no processing, of course. Read more However, they support different resolution audio. Theoretically, DSD allows solving issues of an analog filter of a digital-to-analog converter. Practically, it is a matter of recording quality and equipment distortions. DSD files. See video Despite DSD give some audio-equipment-design advantages to achieve better sound quality, only audio device implementation defines the actual sound quality of a device.
How to look for the best quality of your audio system read here AIFF is a more flexible format almost non-limited audio resolution, but some limitations with file length more than 4 GBytes.
FLAC has better metadata compatibility with music devices and software. Both formats have the same sound quality.
DSD is a sample rate Many factors impact to sound difference between MQA and DSD: implementation of recording and playback equipment, mix and postproduction quality of a recording. Also, it needs to remember, that MQA is lossy. But we can compare only implementation of given audio systems. However, the xDSD created a bigger soundstage and a tighter low end, indicating to me that it had a lower noise floor.
Compare the ranking of various headphones, earbuds and in-ear monitors using our tools. Discuss this, and much more, over on our forum. MajorHiFi Sponsors:. Find out how you can become a sponsor here. Sign in. Log into your account. Forgot your password? Password recovery.
Recover your password.
Specialties wattpuppy 8, ci audio d100, 2015 kalman rubinson, holts audio glossary, 2020 stereophile 年度最佳產品, d i o, εδώ η αναφορά, famous hit factory, linear frequency scale, sonlink dac stereophilecom, levy funeral mariachi, 802d anechoic response, column this week, recommended component list, 2013 wrap up